This is the mail archive of the cygwin-talk mailing list for the cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81

From: mwoehlke <mwoehlke at tibco dot com>
To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:20:55 -0500
Subject: Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060815151104.0b40e260@pop.nycap.rr.com> <01b901c6c116$21259430$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <6.2.3.4.2.20060816091525.0ab90af0@pop.nycap.rr.com> <20060816144110.GX20467@calimero.vinschen.de> <20060816174406.GA7538@brasko.net> <20060816180659.GA5064@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:44:06PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:

I think your solution is well stated.  Does anyone know who was
maintaining the old patch to make, so that a discussion with that
person could be made more substantial on a technical level?


And ^^^this^^^ is a perfect example of why this discussion is so
frustrating.

Does someone *really* have to tell you who was "maintaining the old
patch"?  If you really need to be told this then you really don't have
the right to an opinion on this subject at all since you clearly haven't
been paying any attention.


I think someone needs to read http://isbn.nu/0671723650
...I'm sure something about "paying attention" is mentioned. :-D

(Sorry, I just COULDN'T resist :-D.)

--
Matthew
vIMprove your life! Now on version 7!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]