This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
RE: Next major Cygwin version?
- From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g dot r dot vansickle at worldnet dot att dot net>
- To: "'The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List'" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:28:00 -0500
- Subject: RE: Next major Cygwin version?
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
[snip]
> >which would explain why that number was skipped. However, I
> also know
> >that CVS has a fondness for odd version numbers, and likes
> to reserve
> >the even ones for some usage that I can't remember.
>
> The even numbers are reserved by the government. They
> maintain hidden branches for their experiments in
> mind-control-through-cygwin. I guess the experiments have
> been successful, if you're claiming never to have seen a
> cygwin version 1.6.x.
>
> cgf
Not on an open line Faylor! You'll blow the whole deal!
--
Gary R. Van Sickle