This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Who hasn't been badly flamed?
- From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna at efn dot org>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:59:34 -0700
- Subject: Re: Who hasn't been badly flamed?
- References: <20050910052536.GA28313@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20050910093628.9774817065D@samwise.efn.org>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 04:35:36AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > >Ok Chris, I'll ask you this yet again: Please point out an
> > >instance of where I have "flamed" you, so that I may apologize,
> > >and we can both put the terrible tragedy behind us. Please again
> > >note that taking you to task for poor behavior (or even what you
> > >would term "trolling") is not a "flame" by anybody's definition.
> > For the record, yes, I do think that you have flamed but I
> > don't require an apology.
> Again you misunderstand: it is *I* who have the requirement here. If I have
> "flamed" you as you claim I have, seems to me it's only fair that you give
> me the opportunity to apologize for it, no?
I have a recollection of your posting what could only be termed
flames, but have absolutely no desire to reread through such dreck in
the archives looking for a link to give you. Especially since you
seem unlikely to acknowlege it at such.
Instead, I invite you to privately reread all your messages criticising
others and reflect upon them.