This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: bash/fork problem on Win server 2003 with terminal serve
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:48:38 -0400
- Subject: Re: bash/fork problem on Win server 2003 with terminal serve
- References: <d3lsht$h81$1@sea.gmane.org> <20050415134734.GB15933@cygbert.vinschen.de> <d3oldt$6o5$1@sea.gmane.org> <d45k32$jl5$1@sea.gmane.org> <20050420135638.GA16098@cygbert.vinschen.de> <d45oid$3cl$1@sea.gmane.org>
- Reply-to: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 03:26:25PM +0100, Lionel B wrote:
>"Corinna Vinschen" wrote...
>> On Apr 20 14:09, Lionel B wrote:
>> > "Lionel B" wrote...
>> > > "Corinna Vinschen" wrote...
>> > > > On Apr 14 14:55, Lionel B wrote:
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I seem to have hit the same issue as described in:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2005-03/msg00919.html
>> > > >
>> > > > Please test the latest snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>> > >
>> > > Thanks, it appears to fix the problem. Will test more thoroughly.
>> >
>> > Just checking: the fix doesn't appear to have made it into the 1.5.15-1 release - is that correct?
>>
>> No.
>
>Errrm... is that:
>
>(A) "No, it hasn't fixed the problem"
>
>or
>
>(B) "No, that is not correct, it has fixed the problem"?
I don't really understand the confusion. You asked "Is that correct?"
Corinna said "No".
Of course, the ultimate answer is "Just download it, try it, come to
your own conclusions, and stop pestering for information that you could
gather on your own".
cgf