This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text] up again (Was Re: cp command - problem with sparse [sparsefile support under NTFS (Win2k)])

On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Oh, dear.  He gave away a reason we ask for cygcheck output: that we
> > don't trust people to have the version they think (and say) they do.
> >
> > It's really important to keep people in the dark on this, so they just
> > follow orders, and don't try to say they already gave all the
> > necessary information.  Is there a way to expunge this message from
> > the archives?
> >
> > Here are some suggestions for variant phrasing of the uncompromising
> > demand, for those who get bored with the same old same old.
> > 	[snip suggestions]
> > Other suggestions?
> Why don't we go with the standard one: "don't make us hack into your
> system -- please attach the output of 'cygcheck -svr'"?
> 	Igor

P.S. It's good to see the cygwin site back up.  WTF happened?
      |\      _,,,---,,_
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"The Sun will pass between the Earth and the Moon tonight for a total
Lunar eclipse..." -- WCBS Radio Newsbrief, Oct 27 2004, 12:01 pm EDT

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]