This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the cygwin project.
RE: Problems creating "-mno-cygwin" DLLs with libtool.
- From: One Angry User <angry at lusers dot org>
- To: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:01:54 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: RE: Problems creating "-mno-cygwin" DLLs with libtool.
- Organization: The Lusers Forum
- References: <NUTMEGzmRf6Ci6nx8dy00000433@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
- Reply-to: Talk Amongst Yourselves <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: Blaaab Babble Boogle Bop <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On a sunny Wednesday, the second day of February, 2005, Dave Korn's computer emitted the following stream of bytes:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> > Sent: 02 February 2005 04:09
> <bock bock b'gawk>
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:02:18PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > >On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > >>Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >>>OTOH, I never have understood why tools insist on including such
> > >>>things as "-lcygwin" or "-lc" on a linker command line.
> > >>
> > >>There's a good reason for libtool to do so, but it escapes me at the
> > >>moment. Trust Me(tm).
> > >
> > >Innate meanness? ;-)
> > For the record: I have nothing to do with libtool.
> > cgf
> ..... and therefore, it cannot possibly be mean? Is that what you meant to
> imply? <g>
Yeah, what kind of world do we live in, when meanness can be copyrighted?!