This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Am I using dumper.exe correctly?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:31:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: Am I using dumper.exe correctly?
- References: <20020110214350.30413.qmail@lizard.curl.com> <380850877.20020111104002@logos-m.ru> <20020114175405.9881.qmail@lizard.curl.com> <96167013072.20020114211637@logos-m.ru> <20020114214629.22496.qmail@lizard.curl.com> <192230668183.20020115145735@logos-m.ru> <20020122184316.25503.qmail@lizard.curl.com> <20020122185125.GB31262@redhat.com> <20020211195338.27091.qmail@lizard.curl.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 02:53:38PM -0500, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:51:25 -0500
>> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
>>
>> If Egor gets his patch accepted into binutils, I'll be happy to produce
>> a new version of gdb.
>
>Egor's patch was checked into the repository on January 26 (or, at
>least, so says the bfd/ChangeLog). I eagerly await a new gdb release
>:-).
There are still some problems with gdb. A gdb engineer is looking into
it.
cgf