Re: Bad address

[Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd at yahoo dot com>]

--- Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 12:52:54PM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >I found the bug in texinfo-4.0. :) However, a call to perror is causing the
> >associated output of "Bad address".  I didn't see anything obvious with
> perror,
> >but I also haven't gotten down to the puts and putc calls either.  The data
> >types being passed from texinfo to perror are declared as char * so I'm
> >assuming this has to do with the REENT portion of the function.
> 
> I believe that this error was discussed in cygwin or cygwin-developers a
> month or two ago.  Someone had a patch that was rejected by the texinfo
> maintainer.

I wasn't trying to report the texinfo bug, I was trying to report the perror
bug which is a function existing in the newlib/libc/stdio/perror.c file.  I'll
see if I can work up a simple test program that exhibits the problem.

Regards,

=====
---
   Earnie Boyd: <mailto:earnie_boyd@yahoo.com>
            __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
Cygwin Newbies: <http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html>
           __Minimalist GNU for Windows__
  Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32/>
    Mingw Home: <http://www.mingw.org/>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com