This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Question about clisp version naming
- From: Ken Brown <kbrown at cornell dot edu>
- To: cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:35:50 -0400
- Subject: Question about clisp version naming
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
I've succeeded in making dynamic loading of modules work in clisp on
Cygwin, and I'll be issuing a new release soon.
My work was based on the tip of the upstream Mercurial repository, which
shows a version number of 2.49+ and is at revision 15623. So I was
thinking of using 2.49+hg15623 as the version number. Will upset be
happy with that? Or is there some other standard way of assigning
version numbers in cases like this?
Ken