This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [RFU 64bit] gmp / mpfr / mpc / ppl / isl / cloog-ppl / cloog
- From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko at nexgo dot de>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 07:30:08 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFU 64bit] gmp / mpfr / mpc / ppl / isl / cloog-ppl / cloog
- References: <8761zfu513 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <1366582084 dot 8384 dot 8 dot camel at YAAKOV04> <87bo97umuw dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <87r4htxj2m dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <517F64BE dot 3030806 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <87d2tc0wq3 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <5180E407 dot 50504 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <87d2t99olv dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <5182E843 dot 2060800 at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
>> MPC is called mpclib in 32bit and libmpc in 64bit â which one to
>> keep?
>
> While the libmpc name makes more sense IMO, as we're already using
> mpclib, you could stick with that. Only the source package uses this
> name, so changing this now won't really affect anything.
Can't you simply tell me how I should name it or should I throw a coin?
>> PPL has its doc in ppl-doc rather than libppl-doc in both 32bit
>> and 64bit â change to libppl-doc per your rules or keep?
>
> My "rules" would say ppl-doc.
What do your rules resolve to w.r.t. libgmp-doc, libmpfr-doc,
libmpc-doc? That's what they're named on 32bit and those were the
trigger for me having second thoughts about the whole naming exercise in
the first place.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds