This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: 64 bit: "noarch" packages and going beta
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:21:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: 64 bit: "noarch" packages and going beta
- References: <20130410131656 dot GA5138 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <CAF1jjLsfpiDzV06uCzx=gDSprpLREZULUC4=j8XbwrehdtKzJQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Apr 10 03:38, NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Greetings venerable maintainers,
> >
> >
> > I have two questions:
> >
> > - Does anybody know of a simple way to find out which packages in the 32
> > bit distro are actually "noarch' packages? The reason I'm asking is
> > that I'm looking for a simple way to fill up the 64 bit distro with
> > all the packages which don't come with binaries, but consist entirely
> > of scripts and docs.
> >
> > - Those of you testing the 64 bit Cygwin: How do you judge the
> > stability of the 64 bit Cygwin DLL? Is it still rather pre-beta, or
> > are we in a stage where we can offically open up the test distro to a
> > wider audience?
>
> Might not be a bad idea to get the gcc testsuite to pass. It's huge,
> and thus somewhat comprehensive.
>
> Maybe there's some other packages out there with giant testsuites, too.
Not exactly giant testsuites, but openssh, gawk and sed testsuites passed.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat