This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: std::arg() bug : not repetitive ?
- From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri at yahoo dot it>
- To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:08:38 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: std::arg() bug : not repetitive ?
--- Mer 2/9/09, Dave Korn ha scritto:
> Da: Dave Korn
> Oggetto: Re: std::arg() bug : not repetitive ?
> A: "Marco Atzeri"
> Cc: cygwin cygwin.com, "Dave Korn" <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>
> Data: Mercoledì 2 settembre 2009, 12:43
> Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> > Are this setting acceptable for a cygwin package ?
> >
> > -march=pentium4 -msse -mfpmath=sse
>
> ? I think this bit of the thread should move to the
> -apps list.? I can't
> answer your question directly, but I'll note that CPUs
> without SSE support
> must be pretty thinly spread these days.? But, if we
> do this, it really is the
> complete death of backward-compatibility for those older
> CPUs.? I can't say
> how much of a bad thing that would be.
>
> ? ? cheers,
> ? ? ? DaveK
>
I also don't like such solution.
I also noted that only -msse -mfpmath=sse
is not effective, and I have no clue if -march=pentium4
is acceptable for AMD cpu's.
Cheers
Marco