cygwin-apps archive
subject index for February, 2009

This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

[HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7

[ITP] iperf 2.0.4

[ITP] xineramaproto, libXinerama

[RFC] GCC-4 new packaging.

[RFU 1.7] cron-4.1-57

[RFU 1.7] rsync-3.0.4-1

[RFU 1.7] rsync-3.0.5-1

[RFU 1.7] serf-0.3.0-2

[RFU-1.7] astyle-1.23-1

[RFU] [1.7] Base-Files

Re: [RFU] [1.7] Base-Files 3.8-2

[RFU] [1.7] Base-Files 3.8-3 (was 3.8-2)

[RFU] serf-0.3.0-1

Re: [RFU] {qhull,libqhull_5,libqhull-devel}-2003.1-4

[Thread reset] GCC4 vs binutils

_update-info-dir (was Re: [RFC] GCC-4 new packaging.)

almost ITA for lapack

Ditto apr1 and aprutil1 (was Two identically-named libtool directories)

FAQ entries about emacs

Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)

Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)

Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)

Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)

gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)

Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)

GCC4 status.

GCC4 update [was Re: almost ITA for lapack]

Re: Hold off any new binutils release for one more upstream patch? [was Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem]

Hold off any new binutils release for one more upstream patch? [was Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem]

ITP: [vote] topgit -- A Git patch queue manager

ITP: tack-1.06-1

joe packaging

Odd upset bug is stalling setup.ini updates

Packages up for adoption

posh setup.hint

Re: RFU: bzr 1.11-1

RFU: joe-3.7-1

RFU: posh-0.6.15-1

Re: RFU: tig-0.13-1

RFU: tig-0.13-2

Re: Setup.exe issues between Win2k and WinXP - does it use different logic for setup retrieval or package ver selection

Re: Setup.exe issues between Win2k and WinXP - does it use different logic for setup retrieval or package ver selection

Re: Setup.exe issues between Win2k and WinXP - does it use different logic for setup retrieval or package ver selection

Two identically-named libtool directories

Re: Updated: [Test-version] xemacs-21.5.28-3/xemacs-tags-21.5.28-3/xemacs-emacs-common-21.5.28-3

Uploading gcc-3.4.4-999 now.


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3