This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
[HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7
[ITP] iperf 2.0.4
[ITP] xineramaproto, libXinerama
[RFC] GCC-4 new packaging.
[RFU 1.7] cron-4.1-57
[RFU 1.7] rsync-3.0.4-1
[RFU 1.7] rsync-3.0.5-1
[RFU 1.7] serf-0.3.0-2
[RFU-1.7] astyle-1.23-1
[RFU] [1.7] Base-Files
Re: [RFU] [1.7] Base-Files 3.8-2
[RFU] [1.7] Base-Files 3.8-3 (was 3.8-2)
[RFU] serf-0.3.0-1
Re: [RFU] {qhull,libqhull_5,libqhull-devel}-2003.1-4
[Thread reset] GCC4 vs binutils
_update-info-dir (was Re: [RFC] GCC-4 new packaging.)
almost ITA for lapack
Ditto apr1 and aprutil1 (was Two identically-named libtool directories)
FAQ entries about emacs
Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)
Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)
Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)
Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)
gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)
Re: gcc FAQ entries (was Re: [HEADSUP] Maintainers, please switch to Cygwin 1.7)
GCC4 status.
GCC4 update [was Re: almost ITA for lapack]
Re: Hold off any new binutils release for one more upstream patch? [was Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem]
Hold off any new binutils release for one more upstream patch? [was Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem]
ITP: [vote] topgit -- A Git patch queue manager
ITP: tack-1.06-1
joe packaging
Odd upset bug is stalling setup.ini updates
Packages up for adoption
posh setup.hint
Re: RFU: bzr 1.11-1
RFU: joe-3.7-1
RFU: posh-0.6.15-1
Re: RFU: tig-0.13-1
RFU: tig-0.13-2
Re: Setup.exe issues between Win2k and WinXP - does it use different logic for setup retrieval or package ver selection
Re: Setup.exe issues between Win2k and WinXP - does it use different logic for setup retrieval or package ver selection
Re: Setup.exe issues between Win2k and WinXP - does it use different logic for setup retrieval or package ver selection
Two identically-named libtool directories
Re: Updated: [Test-version] xemacs-21.5.28-3/xemacs-tags-21.5.28-3/xemacs-emacs-common-21.5.28-3
Uploading gcc-3.4.4-999 now.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]