This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: MinGW runtime and w32api

From: "Chris Sutcliffe" <ir0nh34d at gmail dot com>
To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 22:02:27 -0400
Subject: Re: MinGW runtime and w32api
References: <2bf229d30809061715m7cc41c38uf86bdcda35338180@mail.gmail.com> <48C322AE.F5C6DF29@dessent.net> <20080907015632.GA11658@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>

>>>My question is, should I use the same naming convention for the Cygwin
>>>distribution, or keep things the status quo?
>>
>>That doesn't conform to the Cygwin standards, so I'd say no.
>
> Especially since upset would croak on the numbering.

Fair enough, status quo it is.

Chris

-- 
Chris Sutcliffe
http://emergedesktop.org

References:
- MinGW runtime and w32api
  - From: Chris Sutcliffe
- Re: MinGW runtime and w32api
  - From: Brian Dessent
- Re: MinGW runtime and w32api
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]