Charles Wilson <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu> writes:
I think you made the right decision to go ahead with guile for now.
You can always release the next version/update of guile using mknetrel
if/when it will do what you need.
Ok. It was just that I really wanted to strive to unite efforts,
esp. after your compassionate post about packaging...
But don't give up on mknetrel -- it is GOOD that cgf is going slow
and careful.
Yes, of course it is. At times I wish for our dictators to be a bit
more benevolent, esp. after several long night hacking sessions. It's
easy to get a bit frustated upon a reject.
Slow and steady wins the race. You don't have reach the "ultimate
solution" with mknetrel right away. Come back to it after lily-1.66,
and see how you can work with cgf's requirements.
Sure I will. I'm just always a bit impatient. I already resubmitted
patch #2 (debug), and made some suggestions for changes in #5 (split).
Jan et al.,