This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See crosstool-NG for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Refactor autoconf options and build scripts


Jean-Marie,

>> If, it is OK for you, I can finish the travis part. I just need to
>> identify the "standard" samples.
> From my point you have the "OK". It is better to start with a few tests, than
> nothing (like now).
> When someone of us has time, we can add more (GCC/binutils/... version).
I haven't seen a pull request from you nor any new commit on your branch.
What else is missing to continue with this?

BR
   Jasmin

*********************************************************************

On 2015-09-16 16:50, Jasmin J. wrote:
> Jean-Marie,
> 
>> This way we can quickly identify regression on standard samples with
>> travis, and run full regression test when developing / reworking some
>> major features.
> I see the problem, that the samples doesn't define a gcc/binutils/... version.
> So the tests are done with the default (newest) versions of the tools.
> If we go the direction samples, then we should define the most important
> configurations for older GCC versions, too. I don't know which combination(s)
> would be representative. This is something Bryan can do best, I think.
> 
> Maybe we don't need to define this combinations within the samples. We can
> define this in the travis-ci configuration, I guess.
> If you look here:
>   http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build/#Build-Matrix
>   -> Explicity Including Builds
> Can be used to define an additional env: for the GCC/binutils/... version.
> 
>> This way we can quickly identify regression on standard samples with
>> travis, and run full regression test when developing / reworking some
>> major features.
> I agree!
> 
>> If, it is OK for you, I can finish the travis part. I just need to
>> identify the "standard" samples.
>>From my point you have the "OK". It is better to start with a few tests, than
> nothing (like now).
> When someone of us has time, we can add more (GCC/binutils/... version).
> 
> BR
>    Jasmin
> 
> --
> For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
> 

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]