This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Martin, On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 07:57:34PM +0100, Martin Guy wrote: > On 31/12/2013, Mau Z <zmau1962@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have no problems with licenses (all in the same city). > > You may not, but the GNU foundation and your customers may! > > If you give executables of GPL-ed software to people, you must also > make available to them the sources used to created those binaries: the > tarballs of the binutils, gcc, glibc sources and, of course, of the > build system used to compile them (crosstool-ng). That's is not my understanding of the license. According to subsection 6b of the GPLv3 license (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html), it is enough to "accompany" the binary program you distribute with "a written offer... to give... a copy of the Corresponding Source...". No need to send the huge pack of source code when nobody asked for it. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il - -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |