This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Florian, Bryan, All, On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:35:21 Florian Fainelli wrote: > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:31:28 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > Florian, Bryan, All, > > > > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:06:43 Bryan Hundven wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > # HG changeset patch > > > > # User Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > > > > # Date 1349256753 -7200 > > > > # Node ID 7f6ddb2b0ca0d89fa5bc98c1deb55d840b505ccd > > > > # Parent 43ace4bb005eef085437e3d4fbaef528ef0ef005 > > > > [PATCH] libc/eglibc: add an option to enable obsolete RPC building > > > > Florian, OK, looks good :-) I will look at it tonight when back home. > > Thank you! > > > > > Wouldn't this affect glibc-2.16 as well? In that case, it maybe better > > > to put this in glibc-eglibc.sh-common, so when glibc-2.16 is added to > > > ct-ng, it will just work (famous last words). > > > > Bryan, the code is already in glibc-eglibc-common, only the option is > > specific to eglibc. > > > > We do not have glibc-2.16 yet in ct-ng. When/if someone pushes a patch to > > add glibc-2.16, _then_ we can think of a way to move the option to the > > common area. > > Bryan's concern looks valid to me, so if you want me to respin with this > addressed, I really do not mind. In that case, please add: config LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC bool config LIBC_GLIBC_ENABLE_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC bool prompt "Enable obsoloete sunrpc" depends on LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC Then (e)glibc versions that have support for obsoloete sunrpc can 'select' the LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC symbol, and the option becomes visible. While you are at it, could you spin a patch that basically adds: config LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC bool comment "This version of (e)glibc does *not* have sunrpc" depends on LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC Then (e)glibc (both 2.14 and 2.15, IIRC) versions that do not have sunrpc at all can select the LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC symbol, and the warning becomes visible. Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +0/33 662376056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ^ | | --==< O_o >==-- '------------.-------: X AGAINST | /e\ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | (*_*) | / \ HTML MAIL | """ conspiracy. | '------------------------------'-------'------------------'--------------------' -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |