This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See crosstool-NG for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] libc/eglibc: add an option to enable obsolete RPC building


Florian, Bryan, All,

On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:35:21 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:31:28 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > Florian, Bryan, All,
> > 
> > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:06:43 Bryan Hundven wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > # HG changeset patch
> > > > # User Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> > > > # Date 1349256753 -7200
> > > > # Node ID 7f6ddb2b0ca0d89fa5bc98c1deb55d840b505ccd
> > > > # Parent  43ace4bb005eef085437e3d4fbaef528ef0ef005
> > > > [PATCH] libc/eglibc: add an option to enable obsolete RPC building
> > 
> > Florian, OK, looks good :-) I will look at it tonight when back home.
> > Thank you!
> > 
> > > Wouldn't this affect glibc-2.16 as well? In that case, it maybe better
> > > to put this in glibc-eglibc.sh-common, so when glibc-2.16 is added to
> > > ct-ng, it will just work (famous last words).
> > 
> > Bryan, the code is already in glibc-eglibc-common, only the option is
> > specific to eglibc.
> > 
> > We do not have glibc-2.16 yet in ct-ng. When/if someone pushes a patch to
> > add glibc-2.16, _then_ we can think of a way to move the option to the
> > common area.
> 
> Bryan's concern looks valid to me, so if you want me to respin with this 
> addressed, I really do not mind.

In that case, please add:
    config LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC
        bool

    config LIBC_GLIBC_ENABLE_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC
        bool
        prompt "Enable obsoloete sunrpc"
        depends on LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC

Then (e)glibc versions that have support for obsoloete sunrpc can 'select'
the LIBC_GLIBC_HAS_OBSOLETE_SUNRPC symbol, and the option becomes visible.

While you are at it, could you spin a patch that basically adds:
    config LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC
        bool

    comment "This version of (e)glibc does *not* have sunrpc"
        depends on LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC

Then (e)glibc (both 2.14 and 2.15, IIRC) versions that do not have sunrpc at
all can select the LIBC_GLIBC_MISSES_SUNRPC symbol, and the warning becomes
visible.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +0/33 662376056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |   ^                |
| --==< O_o >==-- '------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  /e\  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | (*_*) | / \ HTML MAIL    |  """  conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------'-------'------------------'--------------------'

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]