This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes: >> I will rework the patch to set CT_TARGET_KERNEL depending on both >> CT_ARCH_USE_MMU and CT_ARCH. So "linux" for bfin and "uclinux" for >> m68k. > > hard coding one way or the other is wrong. bfin-uclinux is valid, as is m68k- > uclinux and arm-uclinux and mips-uclinux and many other targets. Well, the fact is that either GCC has to be changed to handle linux/uclinux in the arch tuple to your preferences, or ct-ng has to be able to handle it. The current situations makes ct-ng unable to build linux-uclibc for m68k cpus without mmu. So what do you propose? /Esben -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |