This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PPL 0.11-0.11.2 to compile with --disable-shared


Yann --

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Yann E. MORIN
<yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote:
> Anthony, All,
>
> On Wednesday 18 May 2011 18:30:48 Anthony Foiani wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Anthony Foiani <anthony.foiani@gmail.com>
>> # Date 1305735960 21600
>> # Branch ppl-makefile-fix
>> # Node ID e01dc15b3a38972b154c7eefb3017f379bcf2520
>> # Parent Âb0f8758c8830ca20eaec0948e2cc081cc8e29b40
>> Fix PPL 0.11-0.11.2 to compile with --disable-shared
>
> Applied as #139b85d70b62. Thank you!

As always, you're welcome!

(Although the fact that ct-ng is at 1.11 and ppl is at 0.11 managed to
confuse me a bit today... need more sleep.)

A quick question: for this style of fix (same patch applied to
multiple versions of a given package): should we duplicate the text
(as I did in this patch) or should we try to do some sort of
symlinking instead?  For small patches like this, the space
consumption isn't an issue, although it could be for larger patches.
I'm more interested in the "fix it in one place" feature that symlinks
would provide.

I don't know how well hg (or any SCM, really) handles symlinks, tho.

Anyway. Just a thought/question.

Best regards,
Tony

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]