This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: CLOOG/ppl failure in ct-ng 1.9.0


On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:40 AM, eastyhasta <eastyhasta@hotmail.fr> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Xianghua Xiao-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Bob Dunlop <bob.dunlop@xyzzy.org.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 04 at 02:41, Xianghua Xiao wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>> [ERROR] Â ÂBuild failed in step 'Installing CLooG/ppl'
>>>> ...
>>>>> This is on Ubuntu 10.04.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone saw this?
>>>>
>>>> Yep, seen it on Gentoo as well.
>>>>
>>>> I just downgraded the build to CLooG 0.15.9 and all was fine so I guess
>>>> the problem is actually with CLooG 0.15.10 rather than ct-ng 1.9.0.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Â Â Â ÂBob Dunlop
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is correct, last night I switched ot CLooG 0.15.9 and it finished
>>> without errors this morning.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Xianghua
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hello everyone
>> I have the same issue with crosstool-ng-1.9.1 and crosstool-ng-1.9.2.
>> I am new on programming on Linux and I don't understand your solution.
>> Can you explain it?
>> How to downgrade the build to ClooG 0.15.9??
>
> There are a few patches floating around, but I'm not sure that path
> leads to the right solution.
>
> http://repo.or.cz/w/cloog-ppl.git -- the cloog-ppl repository
> (originally a port of cloog to the parma polyhedra library) hasn't had
> an update since late August of 2010. But PPL is still very busy...
>
> http://repo.or.cz/w/cloog.git -- which was the original cloog tree has
> released 0.16.1 4 days ago, and PolyLib
> (http://icps.u-strasbg.fr/polylib/) has been gpl3 since January of
> 2010.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite/Merge_CLooG_PPL_back_to_CLooG
>
> I wonder if newer toolchains should use Cloog+PolyLib_or_PPL instead
> of Cloog-PPL+PPL, and if it is tested? If this is true, then please
> remove 0.15.10.

I misspoke. It would be: ClooG+PPL instead of ClooG-PPL+PPL

> To use 0.15.9, in `ct-ng menuconfig` navigate to:
> Â ÂCompanion Libraries Â--->
> Â ÂCLooG/ppl version (0.15.10) Â--->
> Â Âand select 0.15.9
>
> Or...
>
> Edit your .config file and set
> Â ÂCT_CLOOG_V_0_15_10=y
> to
> Â Â# CT_CLOOG_V_0_15_10 is not set
>
> ...and set
> Â Â# CT_CLOOG_V_0_15_9 is not set
> to
> Â ÂCT_CLOOG_V_0_15_9=y
>
> ...and set
> Â ÂCT_CLOOG_VERSION to 0.15.9
>
> I prefer the ct-ng menuconfig way, personally. ;-)
>
>> Thanks
>> Eastyhasta
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/CLOOG-ppl-failure-in-ct-ng-1.9.0-tp30135491p30651275.html
>> Sent from the Sourceware - crossgcc list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> --
>> For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
>>
>>
>
>
> -Bryan
>

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]