This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote: >>> To be a little bit more constructive, you see only the small picture. >>> I don't care gcc working for you or not. Beside correctness, what I do >>> care about is about all the other user of gcc not using crosstool-ng. >>> At this point several path can arise: >>> Â- the issue is real, the patch right, it gets in gcc, and all the >>> open-source community take benefits >>> Â- the issue is real, but the patch is wrong, then the gcc devs can >>> fix it correctly and all the open-source community take benefits >>> Â- the issue is ct-ng specific, then Yann would have to fix the issue >>> inside ct-ng. >> >> Had this been your initial comment, I would have agreed, and would >> have happily declined this patch. >> > Glad we agree on something! do you have a bugzilla URL I can follow > the resolution of the issue ? :) Well, I don't have this issue on my arm platform, I was merely trying to help Mychel. I have no interest in this issue. But if Mychel were so inclined, I would suggest he opens a bug against the 4.4 branch. > Thanks, > Â- Arnaud > -Bryan -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |