This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 19:28 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > what do you think about the idea of directly using git repos > instead of standalone patches ? > > My idea would be using an canonical repository layout (just like > my oss-qm repos) where ct-ng could checkout the appropriate trees > on package name and (normalized) version number. If someone likes > to have different sources (instead of now different patch dirs), > he would simply use another repository or ref prefix. First, I would like to state that I am a great fan of git, and use it for almost all my CM needs. But I am just as big a fan of KISS, and in this case, I cannot help myself having a really bad fealing about this. The current patch file approach is definitely KISS. And I fail to see the shortcomings. Having integrated ct-ng into a build system, I also find the current patch system easy to handle for local changes. So, could someone please explain which problem is being addressed here? (did anyone say "don't fix it, if it ain't broken"?) /Esben -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |