This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday, June 8, 2010, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote: > Chris, All, > > [Chris, please keep the list CCed next time] Whoops. > > On Tuesday 08 June 2010 22:18:12 Chris Morgan wrote: >> I picked bare metal because I'm trying to build a gnu toolchain to >> replace IARs arm toolchain. > > IARs == ? > IAR makes several kinds of embedded compilers but I wanted to try to build without their toolchain. >> We are using Seggers embOS on the board right now so >> picking a linux target didn't seem to make sense. > > OK, so you do have a reason for bare-metal, then. Better check the obvious > first... :-) > >> Does picking bare mean that c++ isn't possible using the gcc included >> stdc++? > > Looks like it, indeed. As a wild guess, I'd say that libstd++ has a > 'dependency' upon the hosting system, and when you do target bare-metal, > you have to provide low-level functions that are required by libstdc++. > > Apart that, I don't know. I don't use bare-metal much these days, and > I never ever used C++ on bare-metal... > Hmm. I was also planning on building a mico32 toolchain at some point but I would also need c++ support there as well on a bare metal system. I looked through the build log but don't see any warnings about c++ or stdc++ in gcc's configure or build output.. I'm not sure when during the gcc build stdc++ is built. I can try a Linux x86 build to see. Chris -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |