Re: Building a static toolchain ?

[Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar at gmail dot com>]

Hi,

[sorry to break the thread, I'm not yet subscribed to the list]

Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2010-03-31 23:25, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>>>> - make sure any extra dependencies, usually libgmp and/or libmpfr,
>>>> *are* statically linked into the toolchain executables, since not
>>>> everybody will have those as .so files on their system, or may have
>>>> different, incompatible versions.
>>>
>>> Yes, and those *I* was not able to properly build statically (yet!)...
>>> :-(
>>
>> For that, I use something like the attached patch, which should apply
>> cleanly to gcc 4.3.3, but most likely also to later versions.
>
>Why bother to patch gcc. Just ./configure the mpfr and friends with
>"--enable-static --disable-shared". Works like charm here.
Yes, I just build a i486/GCC 4.4.3/uclibc 0.9.31 that way, see the
attached patch. These is just a nasty hack to fix gcc link (ppl needs
libstdc++, which is not used automatically when gcc is called ()).
--enable-static was not needed in my case, but may solve the stdc++
crap... I'll give it a try.

The reason I need that is to get rid of the wrapper logic which
doesn't play nice on non GNU system.

 - Arnaud

Attachment: 0001-static-companion-libs.patch
Description: Binary data

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq