This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Success building seemingly native toolchain

From: Richard Strand <richard dot strand at icomera dot com>
To: Oron Peled <oron at actcom dot co dot il>
Cc: "crossgcc at sourceware dot org" <crossgcc at sourceware dot org>, "Yann E. MORIN" <yann dot morin dot 1998 at anciens dot enib dot fr>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:03:58 +0100
Subject: Re: Success building seemingly native toolchain
References: <4AAFC7B0.20605@icomera.com> <200909282209.56222.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> <4AC23A57.3060406@icomera.com> <200909300107.04449.oron@mailhub.home.il>

Oron Peled wrote:

On Tuesday, 29 ×September 2009 18:48:23 Richard Strand wrote:
The toolchain is working perfectly for me and I've not run into any problems yet. Changing to -O2 sounds like a good idea as long as it doesn't break builds for any other architectures.
I'm not sure if it's related, but AFAIR g++ only consider inline of C++ methods with -O2 or more (maybe some of the inline methods are crucial for g++ or glibc itself).

It seems that if no CFLAGS are specified when compiling glibc then it automatically uses -O2. Hopefully this means that -O2 is safe, and is probably preferable to using -O.

Regards,

--Richard Strand


--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

References:
- Success building seemingly native toolchain
  - From: Richard Strand
- Re: Success building seemingly native toolchain
  - From: Yann E. MORIN
- Re: Success building seemingly native toolchain
  - From: Richard Strand
- Re: Success building seemingly native toolchain
  - From: Oron Peled

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]