This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Thanks for the suggestion. I can't really put in the time for doing that as my work is related to something else. I want to use scanf() to conduct tests on the ARM processor. However, floating point computations are performed correctly. If I set float a = -3.5; then it gets registered properly as a negative. I'm not sure that this is a problem with the floating point processing. On a side note, is it not enough to select "soft float" in the configuration to avoid the wasted hardware interrupts to the "extinct" FPU? Back to the problem, how could I approach isolating this bug, if it is indeed a problem with scanf() (or is it almost certainly not to do with scanf)? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/scanf-doesn%27t-work-tp24093905p24112757.html Sent from the Sourceware - crossgcc list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |