This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [CT-NG] [RFC] EXPERIMENTAL features and snapshot versions

From: "Martin Guy" <martinwguy at yahoo dot it>
To: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann dot morin dot 1998 at anciens dot enib dot fr>
Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:29:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [CT-NG] [RFC] EXPERIMENTAL features and snapshot versions
References: <200809022233.33720.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

>  On the other hand, some samples use a snapshot version of some components
>  (most notably uClibc) because no recent release is yet available, and the
>  snapshot is working well.
>
>  So, my question to the crosstol-NG users hanging around:
>  Should we keep snapshot versions guarded with EXPERIMENTAL, or not?

I'd supply examples with the latest official release wherever possible.
Examples configs are most important for first-time users doing a
confidence test (to see if they can get the newly-downloaded thing to
work at all...) and as bases for people to refine to their own
specific needs, so I'd make then as stable as possible.

    M

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [CT-NG] [RFC] EXPERIMENTAL features and snapshot versions
  - From: Yann E. MORIN

References:
- [CT-NG] [RFC] EXPERIMENTAL features and snapshot versions
  - From: Yann E. MORIN

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]