This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sun, 6 May 2007, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 09:07 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Sun, 6 May 2007, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 05:12 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > > 1) is there any *theoretical* reason why the generated headers from > > > > the latest kernel source tree shouldn't work for *all* builds? yes or > > > > no? if not, why not? > > > > > > The obvious reason: many cross builds are not targeting linux! > > > > ok, i should have been more precise -- for those builds that *require* > > a set of kernel headers, the newly-generated ones via "make > > headers_install" should be universally sufficient. > > This isn't precise. ALL builds require a set of system headers, because > critical things like libstdc++ will not build unless system headers are > provided. > > My point is that the system headers you need to install are inherently > dependent on the target OS. oh, wait, do you mean just that i would have to run: $ make ARCH=whatever headers_install to match the target architecture? sorry, i had that in my earlier posts but forgot to put it in here. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |