This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Toralf Lund wrote: > > You can just get this as a side effect of building your standard > > cross-binutils instead of an extra step by adding > > --enable-install-libbfd to the toplevel configure. > > > Won't that install the wrong type of binary? (See my original post.) You're right, that will give you a host-libbfd and you want a target-libbfd. I scanned too fast. I think the reason that you are having trouble installing just libbfd from a binutils tree is that it was never designed to be a standalone library, only for consumption by projects in the 'src' tree, i.e. gdb, binutils, sim, etc. It isn't maintained with a stable interface, or versioned at all. I'm rather surprised that a third party project uses it without providing their own in-tree copy of it, given this interface instability. I would expect a lot of trouble with version conflicts if they expect you to just drop in some libbfd of unspecified date. Brian -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |