This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: arm eabi boot progress.

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: Steven Newbury <s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk>
Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org, stevep at freescale dot com
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:52:31 -0400
Subject: Re: arm eabi boot progress.
Geoman: IS A RETARD
References: <20060427074930.58303.qmail@web25005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

On Thursday 27 April 2006 03:49, Steven Newbury wrote:
> I do believe Im there! I had two problems in the end, bash built natively
> and works perfectly.

mmm, yeah, bash is known to not cross-compile well (it mixes signal 
information from the build host into the binary) ... but it should have at 
least ran ...

> The other thing was the kernel headers. 2.6.16 
> headers, including those provided by gentoo are broken with respect to ARM
> EABI. Syscalls that were removed but still defined were confusing glibc.
> This is in addition to those that were fixed in the glibc patch.

they're pretty vanilla headers ... so if they're broken in Gentoo, they're 
broken everywhere ...
-mike

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Follow-Ups:
- Re: arm eabi boot progress.
  - From: Michael K. Edwards
- Re: arm eabi boot progress.
  - From: Steven Newbury

References:
- Re: Re: arm eabi boot progress.
  - From: Steven Newbury

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]