This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
if binutils/gas does not support TLS relocation directives your glibc/NPTL configure builds will complaindon't want to sound like i'm beating this to death, but i really would like to nail the recipe for building a toolchain with NPTL instead of linuxthreads, if it's even possible for SH3 which is what i'm trying.
based on my reading, the first thing to clarify is that the first two steps in the crosstool process:
- kernel headers
- binutils
have you tried applying this patch http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-02/msg00002.html
*however*, as i posted earlier, there is a definite problem if you try
to use the "--enable-kernel" option with 2.6.0, and note above that
it's going to be set to 2.6.4 later in the script.
i'm not sure what's going to happen when i get there, but i'll just do this glibc headers step for now and worry about the rest when the time comes.
any comments on the above?
rday
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.org
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.org
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |