This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 2/15/06, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com> wrote: > 1) how about removing the buildlogs from the basic tarball, and making > that a separate download if people need it? those buildlogs represent > the vast majority of the crosstool tarball, and it's not clear that > every person downloading crosstool is going to ever look at those > logs. I never expected the average person to. They are mainly accessed by people doing google searches for build errors, I think. I'm not sure the extra bulk in the archive hurts too much (considering how big the toolchain tarballs are), but it does make some sense to separate out the buildlogs. > 2) how about removing support for some of the older and superseded > versions of software and getting rid of some of those patch > directories? Nope. Some people need 'em. > in some cases, it's clear you need to keep older versions of some > software. but, as an example, does crosstool really need to supply > patches and support all of gcc 3.4.0, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3 *and* 3.4.4? > > at some point, wouldn't it be easier to reduce the number of versions > to support and just tell people that, if they're using 3.4.3, they > might as well upgrade to 3.4.4? or something like that. > > (as another example, how many different versions of binutils really > need to be supported?) Telling people to switch versions of the compiler or binutils is generally not going to fly. This stuff is very finicky, and if you have a toolchain that works, it's often not clear it's worth the risk to update its components. > 3) how about extending crosstool to support multiple patch > directories? this makes it really easy to add local patches for newer > software without cluttering up the crosstool patches/ directory > itself. i use that technique for my mini script and it makes life a > lot easier. Yes, I might do that. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.org
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |