This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: LINUX_SANITIZED_HEADER_DIR vs LINUX_DIR ?


Steven Scholz asked:
>
> I am using linux-2.6.14 on my embedded ARM system.
> Should I use
>  LINUX_DIR=linux-2.6.14
> or
>  LINUX_SANITIZED_HEADER_DIR=linux-libc-headers-2.6.12.0
>
> when building a cross tool chain with crosstool-0.38?

In general, sanitized headers are always preferred.
Build crosstool with the real kernel headers only
if you run into problems with sanitized headers.
- Dan

--
What does Linux need to succeed on the desktop?  See http://kegel.com/linux/comfort

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]