This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Dan Kegel wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > NOTE!!!!!! keep in mind that this is not a patch being submitted > > upstream for inclusion in gcc, it's just for this upcoming version > > of crosstool, that's all. i've already submitted a bugzilla > > report for this and i *fully* expect someone else who knows more > > about this than i do to properly patch gcc, whenever they get > > around to it. > > Just about every crosstool patch should be of sufficient quality to > submit upstream. So I'm not sure about the distinction you're > making here. only that, in *this* case, i wanted to get enough of a patch in to fix the problem at hand. it wasn't necessarily going to be complete in covering all possible SH architectures, that's all. no offense meant. rday ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |