This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Michael N. Moran wrote: > Dan Kegel wrote: > > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > what that tells me is that the perfectly valid SH3 options -mb and > > > -m3 are unrecognized, which further suggests that the wrong compiler > > > is being used since it doesn't recognize SH3-specific options. > > > > > > Maybe the problem is that the kernel makefile is applying target > > cflags when it shouldn't, for some reason. > > This is exactly what I recently found when compiling a 2.6.x kernel > using GCC 4.0.1 for *ARM*. I had to change the arc/arm/Makefile to > get rid of the obsolete flags. credit where credit is due, it was a private e-mail from michael that pointed me at the appropriate architecture makefile as the source for some unwanted compiler options when trying to run the *native* compiler. my new year's resolution is to use only sanitized headers from now on. rday ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |