Re: Kernel headers.

[Steve Papacharalambous <stevep at zee2 dot com>]

Hi Mike,

The asm-generic directory seems to have been left out from the sanitized 
headers from: http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~mmazur/linux-libc-headers/

Won't this cause errors with packages that have source code that 
includes headers from this directory?

Best regards,

Steve

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 March 2005 01:05 pm, Daniel Kegel wrote:
>
> > I'm tempted to try using the sanitized headers for everything,
> > but I'll probably always keep an option to use the real
> > kernel headers, since the sanitized ones might not work
> > for every platform.
>
>
> the uClibc project has only been using sanitized headers for 2.6 kernels and 
> there havent been any real issues thus far for the common arches ... 
> arm/mips/ppc/sh/x86 ...
>
> Gentoo too only utilizes sanitized headers (we sanitize them ourselves) for 
> native / cross toolchains and again no problems have come up (if you dont 
> count bugs relating to headers that need to be sanitized :]) ... and we cover 
> a bunch more arches than just embedded ones ...
> -mike
>
> ------
> Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
> Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com




------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com