This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I've encountered the problem of kernel headers whilst building the package hdparm. This package fails with compile errors during a build using an e500 powerpc cross compiler built using crosstool, and the cause of the error appears to be related to the kernel headers.
If the sanitized kernel headers: http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~mmazur/linux-libc-headers/ are used by adding -I to the path the package builds without any errors.
This is probably not an ideal solution, so I was wondering whether there is a better solution to this problem?
One thought that I had was to get crosstool.sh to use the raw kernel headers just to build glibc, and use the sanitized kernel headers for the rest of the toolchain build and installation. Can anyone see any problems with this approach?
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |