This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
October 31, 2004
| 22:36 | Linux 2.4.26: ppc32: gen_crc32table.c how and where "uint32_t" is defined ? | Povolotsky, Alexander |
| 21:39 | Re: glibc complains about missing -lgcc_eh for m68k-linux | Peter Barada |
| 21:03 | Re: glibc complains about missing -lgcc_eh for m68k-linux | Dan Kegel |
| 20:50 | Re: glibc complains about missing -lgcc_eh for m68k-linux | Peter Barada |
| 20:24 | Re: crosstool: specifying older kernel + glibc | Dan Kegel |
| 20:10 | Re: 1/2 OT: why is it called "canadian cross" ? | Dimitry Andric |
| 20:04 | 1/2 OT: why is it called "canadian cross" ? | Enrico Weigelt |
| 20:04 | crosstool: specifying older kernel + glibc | Enrico Weigelt |
| 20:04 | moving .dat files to a subdirectory ? | Enrico Weigelt |
| 18:57 | Re: glibc complains about missing -lgcc_eh for m68k-linux | Dan Kegel |
| 17:49 | OT: embedded hardware | Enrico Weigelt |
| 15:48 | glibc complains about missing -lgcc_eh for m68k-linux | Peter Barada |
October 30, 2004
| 05:43 | Re: crosstool error when building termcap | Dan Kegel |
October 29, 2004
| 20:05 | "linux: efficient cross compiling" | Martin Schaffner |
| 18:46 | Re: cross-compiled object sizes too big | David Wuertele |
| 15:14 | Re: building gcc-3.2.3 for x86_64 | Dan Kegel |
| 15:03 | Re: m68k-coff: Unused memory region included in output file? | Peter Barada |
| 14:16 | Re: m68k-coff: Unused memory region included in output file? | Toralf Lund |
| 14:01 | Remove/filter warning message | ollllle ollllle |
| 13:18 | Re: m68k-coff: Unused memory region included in output file? | Peter Barada |
| 08:11 | Re: m68k-coff: Unused memory region included in output file? | Toralf Lund |
| 07:07 | Re: __EH_FRAME_BEGIN__ setup? | Toralf Lund |
| 00:57 | Re: cross-compiled object sizes too big | Dan Kegel |
| 00:55 | Re: Repost: since when is gcc-2.96 insufficient to build gcc? | Dan Kegel |
| 00:52 | Re: Repost: since when is gcc-2.96 insufficient to build gcc? | Dan Kegel |
October 28, 2004
October 27, 2004
| 18:39 | since when is gcc-2.96 insufficient to build gcc? | David Wuertele |
| 17:24 | Re: m68k fails to build with crosstool | Daniel Kegel |
| 16:53 | More Static Linking woes | Allen Curtis |
| 15:44 | Re: m68k fails to build with crosstool | Syed Faisal Akber |
| 15:38 | Re: m68k fails to build with crosstool | Peter Barada |
| 14:57 | Re: m68k fails to build with crosstool | Arno Schuring |
| 13:47 | Re: m68k fails to build with crosstool | Steve Papacharalambous |
| 13:43 | Re: m68k fails to build with crosstool | Steve Papacharalambous |
| 13:24 | m68k fails to build with crosstool | Peter Barada |
| 10:42 | Re: Another gcc-3.4.2 build problem (unknown pseudo op) | Toralf Lund |
| 10:22 | Another gcc-3.4.2 build problem (unknown pseudo op) | Toralf Lund |
October 26, 2004
October 25, 2004
| 18:30 | Building a cross compiler for Vxworks on a Linux target | Iain Woolf |
| 15:37 | Re: Problem to construct a gcc cross-compiler for a powerpc target | Ken Wolcott |
| 14:14 | Re: gcc 3.3.3 (and 3.4.2?) build failure (M68k) | Peter Barada |
| 13:52 | Re: gcc 3.3.3 (and 3.4.2?) build failure (M68k) | Toralf Lund |
| 12:52 | Re: gcc 3.3.3 (and 3.4.2?) build failure (M68k) | Peter Barada |
| 10:10 | gcc 3.3.3 (and 3.4.2?) build failure (M68k) | Toralf Lund |
October 22, 2004
| 18:50 | Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app? | David Wuertele |
| 14:12 | Re: gcc 3.3.3: start, exit etc. unresolved | Toralf Lund |
| 14:07 | Re: gcc 3.3.3: start, exit etc. unresolved | Toralf Lund |
| 13:54 | Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app? | Dan Kegel |
| 13:38 | Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app? | Peter Barada |
| 13:19 | Re: gcc 3.3.3: start, exit etc. unresolved | Jay . Kulpinski |
| 12:55 | Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app? | Toralf Lund |
| 12:44 | Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app? | Dan Kegel |
| 12:40 | Re: Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app? | Dan Kegel |
| 12:33 | gcc 3.3.3: start, exit etc. unresolved | Toralf Lund |
| 09:59 | Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app? | Toralf Lund |
October 21, 2004
| 12:14 | Re: autoconf usage question | Simon Poole |
| 09:18 | Re: autoconf usage question | Kai Ruottu |
| 09:18 | Re: getting memory errors when natively bulding native gnu gcc 3.3.2 compiler on PQ2FADS-VR with 32 MB DRAM memory | Kai Ruottu |
| 07:31 | Re: Static linked cross tools | Marius Groeger |
October 20, 2004
October 19, 2004
October 18, 2004
| 21:27 | adding DESTDIR support to Python-2.2.3 | Daniel Kegel |
| 17:18 | Re: crosstools: Using CC | Daniel Kegel |
October 17, 2004
| 15:27 | Re: getting memory errors when natively bulding native gnu gcc 3.3.2 compiler on PQ2FADS-VR with 32 MB DRAM memory | Lennert Buytenhek |
| 15:20 | getting memory errors when natively bulding native gnu gcc 3.3.2 compiler on PQ2FADS-VR with 32 MB DRAM memory | Povolotsky, Alexander |
| 12:21 | crosstools: Using CC | Neal H. Walfield |
| 05:37 | cross-compiling Python | Dan Kegel |
October 16, 2004
| 08:00 | Fwd: Re: uclib support for crosstools forward ported to 0.28-rc37 | Carl Miller |
| 07:46 | Re: uclib support for crosstools forward ported to 0.28-rc37 | Carl Miller |
| 05:41 | Re: uclib support for crosstools forward ported to 0.28-rc37 | Carl Miller |
| 05:32 | Re: uclib support for crosstools forward ported to 0.28-rc37 | Dan Kegel |
| 05:28 | Re: DESTDIR support for crosstool? | Dan Kegel |
October 15, 2004
| 21:39 | Re: Static linked cross tools | Arno Schuring |
| 18:35 | Re: Static linked cross tools | Allen Curtis |
| 18:26 | Re: Static linked cross tools | Daniel Kegel |
| 18:04 | Re: Top 10 Reasons Republicans Support Kerry | Daniel Kegel |
| 17:57 | Re: Top 10 Reasons Republicans Support Kerry | Robert P. J. Day |
| 17:37 | Static linked cross tools | Allen Curtis |
| 17:27 | Top 10 Reasons Republicans Support Kerry | billshire at aol dot com |
| 12:47 | [PATCH] Typo in crosstool patch | Robert Schwebel |
October 14, 2004
| 04:40 | Re: FW: NPTL support on PPC32 (MPC5200) ? | Dan Kegel |
| 01:56 | Re: FW: NPTL support on PPC32 (MPC5200) ? | Jim Freeman |
October 13, 2004
| 05:42 | Re: FW: NPTL support on PPC32 (MPC5200) ? | Jim Freeman |
| 05:19 | Re: FW: NPTL support on PPC32 (MPC5200) ? | Jim Freeman |
October 12, 2004
| 18:43 | Compiler flags for arm-xscale-linux-gnu toolchain | Likely, Grant |
| 16:27 | Re: FW: NPTL support on PPC32 (MPC5200) ? | Dan Kegel |
| 15:07 | Re: what's the usage of -flimit-inline | Dan Kegel |
| 13:28 | Re: what's the usage of -flimit-inline | Wu Mingqiao |
| 08:10 | what's the usage of -flimit-inline | Wu Mingqiao |
| 07:30 | Re: oops! added --testlinux to all.sh call, now get bin/sh: line 1: scripts/mkdep: Argumentlist too long | Ryan . Oliver |
| 06:09 | Re: oops! added --testlinux to all.sh call, now get bin/sh: line 1: scripts/mkdep: Argument list too long | Arno Schuring |
October 11, 2004
October 10, 2004
| 19:00 | Re: possible error for cross-gcc-2.3.5-glibc-2.3.2? | Dan Kegel |
| 18:35 | Re: possible error for cross-gcc-2.3.5-glibc-2.3.2? | Lennert Buytenhek |
| 18:12 | Re: possible error for cross-gcc-2.3.5-glibc-2.3.2? | Dan Kegel |
| 17:44 | Re: possible error for cross-gcc-2.3.5-glibc-2.3.2? | David Wuertele |
| 11:17 | Re: Versioned glibc symbols | Robert Schwebel |
October 09, 2004
| 16:09 | Re: possible error for cross-gcc-2.3.5-glibc-2.3.2? | Dan Kegel |
| 15:13 | Re: possible error for cross-gcc-2.3.5-glibc-2.3.2? | Dan Kegel |
| 14:50 | Re: possible error for cross-gcc-2.3.5-glibc-2.3.2? | Dan Kegel |
October 08, 2004
| 20:25 | Re: Versioned glibc symbols | Daniel Kegel |
| 17:51 | Re: Versioned glibc symbols | Robert Schwebel |
| 17:11 | Re: Versioned glibc symbols | Daniel Kegel |
| 15:16 | Versioned glibc symbols | Robert Schwebel |
| 13:03 | Re: a problem about softvfp and softfpa | Lennert Buytenhek |
| 12:59 | a problem about softvfp and softfpa | Wu Mingqiao |
| 08:13 | possible error for cross-gcc-2.3.5-glibc-2.3.2? | Carlos de |
October 07, 2004
| 15:29 | Help for MCORE instruction set | mpc555 |
| 06:29 | Re: perl ./configure failure (while attempting to configure forcrosscomp ile build) | Dan Kegel |
| 06:25 | RE: perl ./configure failure (while attempting to configure for crosscomp ile build) | Konovalov, Vadim |
| 06:07 | Re: perl ./configure failure (while attempting to configure for crosscomp ile build) | Robert Schwebel |
| 05:52 | RE: perl ./configure failure (while attempting to configure for crosscomp ile build) | Konovalov, Vadim |
October 06, 2004
| 20:29 | Re: perl ./configure failure (while attempting to configure for crosscomp ile build) | Carl Miller |
| 18:53 | Re: perl ./configure failure (while attempting to configure forcrosscomp ile build) | Daniel Kegel |
| 18:38 | perl ./configure failure (while attempting to configure for crosscompile build) | Alexander Povolotsky |
| 14:43 | Re: ada support in crosstool (was: thanks for your crosstool scripts) | Dan Kegel |
| 14:41 | Ada support in crosstool (was: Cross Compiling using modified crosstool-0.27.tar.gz) | Dan Kegel |
| 06:56 | crosstool-0.28-rc37: Cygwin target. 2nd try at Linux kernel buildtest. | Dan Kegel |
| 06:21 | PMC-Sierra's Little Tiger board ships with crosstool! | Dan Kegel |
October 05, 2004
October 04, 2004
October 03, 2004
| 23:40 | Re: Cross-compiling toolchain default location choice | ncrfgs |
October 02, 2004
| 15:48 | Re: Cross-compiling toolchain default location choice | Dimitry Andric |
| 06:54 | Re: Arrgh. arm 2.4 kernel is a fork. | John Lenz |
| 06:22 | Arrgh. arm 2.4 kernel is a fork. | Dan Kegel |
| 06:08 | Gaaqgthe best price for quality m_,ed_s | merrill durk |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]