Re: Bug in Binutils 2.15 for the H8300H ?

[Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>]

Hansjuergen Dreuth wrote:
> recently I upgraded our GNU toolchain for use with the H8/300h and 
> H8/300s microcontrollers.
> When using the binutils 2.15 the errors shown in the following example
> assembler file occurred. They do not happen if binutils 2.14 are used:
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> .h8300h		;directive for h8300h code 
> .equ NUMBER, 0x80 
> .equ NUMBER2, 0x70
>
> ; 1st error:
>     AND.B	 #~NUMBER, r3l   ; this causes: "Error: invalid operands"
>     AND.B	 #~0x0F, r3l	 ; this works
>     AND.B	 #~NUMBER2, r3l  ; this also works (error seem to depend on the
>         ; number - the most significant bit seems to be the problem)
>
> ; 2nd error (does not occur when ".h8300s" is chosen; but the h8300h also
> ; has this instruction and address mode). The following warning and error
> ; are issued: Warning: Opcode `bclr' with these operand types not 
> ; available in H8/300H mode ; Error: invalid operands
>
>     bclr  #6, @0xFFFFFF7C ; clear RDRF
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Does anybody know what causes these errors and how to correct them ?

I don't, but I suspect this would be a good question to ask
the binutils mailing list.
- Dan


--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com