This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Compiling with other optimization?

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Martin Egholm Nielsen <martin at egholm-nielsen dot dk>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 07:08:43 -0700
Subject: Re: Compiling with other optimization?
References: <cbubed$q4o$1@sea.gmane.org> <cclps6$rl$2@sea.gmane.org>

Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:

I was wondering: If I want to compile my toolchain with another optimization level - e.g. "-Os" - how do I do this? Does the TARGET_CFLAGS="-O -mcpu=405" line in my demo-script have anything to do with that?
Now I've tried with "-Os" as optimisation, but I'm not able to see any difference in library-sizes. My libgcj.so is still around 50 megs - which is the same as before...

Dan, now that you're back (?), are you able to help me with this one?


I'm not back, really.  And I'm pretty sure I can't help make
libgcj any smaller.  You probably want to talk it over with
the developers -- and maybe rethink using precompiled java...
- Dan

--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Compiling with other optimization?
  - From: Martin Egholm Nielsen

References:
- Re: Compiling with other optimization?
  - From: Martin Egholm Nielsen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]