This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> > > The real solution would be building gcc with multilib support, so it > > > builds three separate versions (i.e. FPA hardfloat, FPA softfloat and > > > VFP softfloat) of libgcc and the other runtimes, but I've never > > > understood how to do this with glibc... It doesn't seem to have > > > multilib support. I am using the following test file to determine if softfloat is working or not....can anyone recommend a better test to perform without setting up the remote testing...I will perform all the remote testing as instructed in crosstool once I figure out this softfloat issue... #include <stdlib.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { double d_foo; d_foo = 1233433.3233993; printf("d_foo = %lf\n",d_foo+.1); printf("%f\n", (1.0+3.22+33+443.3345)); } Kernel is a 2.4.24 running on an IXP425: # CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE is not set # CONFIG_FPE_FASTFPE is not set Thanks! -Dave ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |