This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Building static cross compilers

From: Daniel Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Allen Curtis <acurtis at onz dot com>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:55:39 -0700
Subject: Re: Building static cross compilers
References: <85FF02BF-BBBB-11D8-9293-000A95B312BA@onz.com>

Allen Curtis wrote:

Is this straight forward with the scripts? It seems to me that we are a point that many people are running older Linux workstations but require newer GCC cross compilers for development. I fall into that category. When I try to use other precompiled packages they fail due to missing libraries. The best solution would be to provide the host cross compiler tools, statically linked.

Yes. It's a bit of an FAQ. I should figure it out myself and add it to the docs.

Do the following posts help?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2003-10/msg00078.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2003-11/msg00019.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2003-12/msg00123.html

It looks like you need to pass an extra flag when configuring
binutils and a different extra flag when configuring gcc.
- Dan

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- Building static cross compilers
  - From: Allen Curtis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]