This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
But say if my application requires the 'arm-linux-gcc' and the 'arm-linux-ld' to be invoked separately, then isn't it the better way out? > -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Blundell [mailto:pb@nexus.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 7:38 PM > To: Manoj Verma, Noida > Cc: crossgcc@sources.redhat.com; Kai Ruottu; karuottu@mbnet.fi > Subject: Re: ELF_DYNAMIC_INTERPRETER > > > on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 07:29:44PM +0530, Manoj Verma, Noida wrote: > > This is causing the dynamic interpreter of my executable as > > "/usr/lib/ld.so.1" when I link my program using arm-linux-ld. > > "Don't do that, then". > > It would be a better idea to call arm-linux-gcc for linking; it will > pass the appropriate --dynamic-linker option to ld. > > elf32-arm.h is not a Linux-specific file, and it wouldn't > make sense to > hard-wire the Linux program interpreter in there. > > p. > > ------ > Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, > http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ > Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to > crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com > ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |