This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 06:09:37PM -0700, Viswanathan Sankararam wrote: > The question is how will I override the system calls that come with > libc.a with my implementation of the syscalls. Do I just remove syscalls.o > from the archive and add mine. Would that work? Having on the one hand, gcc-generated code that makes posix system calls, and on the other, a raw target with some arbitrary set of service functions, it's a bit optimistic to expect the two to be aware of the existence of each other, let alone be able to interwork. What usually ends up happening is a set of wrapper functions which accept the caller's argument list, and invoke the most appropriate service function available, mapping the arguments. If any degree of robustness is desired, then there arises the question of how well the found service functions satisfy all the possible expectations of the gcc-generated code. That's often when you start rewriting the service functions. Good luck. :-) Erik ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |