This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: More inline arm assembly woes... (long)

From: Bryce Schober <bryceman at dpzone dot com>
To: Carl Miller <chaz at energoncube dot net>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:42:58 -0700
Subject: Re: More inline arm assembly woes... (long)
References: <3F95B876.4090108@dpzone.com> <20031021232712.GI20011@energoncube.net>

Carl Miller wrote:

The final (post-addition) value of result wasn't used anywhere.  Under
optimization, gcc will remove calculation of values it doesn't need.

Of course it does, I apologize for my inanity. I suppose all you real C programmers chuckle at the silliness of assembly programmers' compulsion to examine the compiler output...

--
Bryce Schober
Design Engineer
Dynon Avionics, Inc.
www.dynonavionics.com

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by digiposs.com]


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More inline arm assembly woes... (long)
  - From: Dan Kegel

References:
- More inline arm assembly woes... (long)
  - From: Bryce Schober
- Re: More inline arm assembly woes... (long)
  - From: Carl Miller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]