Re: are glibc hacks in crosstool still necesary?

[Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>]

--- Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
> 
> Generally, when bringing up a new version of gcc or
> glibc,
> I start out without any patches, and bring in just
> the ones
> I need as I run into the problems.  So the pile of
> patches
> I end up with depends on which architectures I built
> and
> tested on...

A good methodology, IMHO. At the moment I'm sort of
trying to distill as simple as possible a recipe for
building a cross-compiler, thus my question about
whether the extra stuff was necessary. I may simply
try to find a good source of prebuilt glibcs though
too...

Cheers,

Dara

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com