This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Joel, If you are using both glibc and uC-libc on the same box, it would be better if you used a separate library. Also does your MIPS platform have an MMU? Are you going to statically link your application or use a shared library? What OS are you running natively on the MIPS-EL box? You can still use your standard GCC if: a - force it not to use the standard libraries and link each library by hand on the command-line including libgcc b - replace glibc from the GCC installed location and replace it with uClibc c - don't replace glibc from the GCC installed location and place uClibc there with it (make sure uClibc and glibc have different names); then change the specs file for GCC to handle the two different libraries differently d - use a wrapper shell script to link uClibc manually by forcing it not to use the standard libraries Faisal On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Joel Coltoff wrote: > Hi, > > We'd like to get a native gcc running on a mipsel embedded system that > has uClibc installed as its libraries. I've got two different platforms > I can use to develop on. I can use my x86 system (the faster one) that > has a cross compiler running on it. I've also got a native compiler > I can use on my mips system. What has got me stuck is that my mips > compiler is linked against glibc. I need to build a uClibc compiler > that is linked against uClibc. What is the best way to proceed here? > Do I need to first build a uClibc that is statically linked and then > use that to compile itself? Pointers to scripts, manuals, URLs or anything > else helpful would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks. > > -- > Joel Coltoff > > We often think that when we have completed our study of one we know all > about two, because "two" is "one and one." We forget that we still have > to make a study of "and." > -- Sir Arthur Eddington > > > ------ > Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ > Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com > > ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |