This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> And on a more philosophic note, shouldn't a compiler just look for > prototype > descriptions and hand the rest off to the linker to resolve? Why does > GCC need > to know ANYTHING about system-specific libraries? Is there some > integration with > binutils that's going on here I don't understand? > Hello, This was the point I was trying to make exactly in my previous post (Can't build gcc-3.0.1 for m68k-coff). I agree completely, the compiler shouldn't need to know anything about system-specific libraries. Maybe some expert can point out what we're missing? Thanks, Larry Gray larry@greenmotor.com > > > > ------ > Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, > http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to > crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |