This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GNUpro vs GCC

To: Christian Groessler <cpg at aladdin dot de>
Subject: Re: GNUpro vs GCC
From: law at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:08:37 -0600
cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, Kai Ruottu <kai dot ruottu at luukku dot com>, crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Reply-To: law at redhat dot com

  In message <87elrhko7d.fsf@panther.aladdin.de>you write:
  > >I believe the correct approach is to ask Red Hat (assuming they were the
  > >authors) to contribute their code to the public sources.  Once that has
  > >been done then you can work on fixing/improving it.
  > 
  > This was the reason of my license question 2 postings ago. But it's
  > maybe the best idea to ask Redhat themselves.
Contributing the Z8000 backend to the public sources would not present
any problem for Red Hat.  I have in fact given the code to a few folks
over the years who had expressed an interest in cleaning it up and
contributing it.

jeff


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

References:
- Re: GNUpro vs GCC
  - From: Christian Groessler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]